A Director Penalty Notice (“DPN”) is a Notice that the Australian Tax Office (“ATO“) can send a director that can make that director personally liable for two types of tax debts of a company - Pay As You Go (“PAYG“) and Superannuation Guarantee Charge (“SGC“) liabilities.There are two types of Director Penalty Notices. The first is the traditional Director Penalty Notice which gives a director 21 days to take certain actions to avoid personal liability. The second type of DPN, often referred to as a “Lockdown DPN”, can make a director automatically personally liable for PAYG and SGC if company tax returns are not lodged on time – there is no opportunity to avoid that liability once the DPN is served on the director.
Yes. As a director, the main way to become personally liable for company tax debts is as a result of the Director Penalty Notice laws. The laws were significantly strengthened in June 2012 and the new laws were designed to, and should, change the way directors view company tax debts. It is now much easier to become personally liable. The 2012 laws have greatly complicated an already difficult area of the law, but their prime objective is to make directors personally liable for some company tax debts.
Director Penalty Notice laws have been around for many years and the most common Notice gives directors 21 days to act. In brief, if a company has outstanding Pay As You Go or Superannuation Guarantee Charge debts then the ATO can send a Director Penalty Notice to a director giving that director 21 days to:
If you’ve received a Director Penalty Notice with a 21-day action period, then a director, not surprisingly, should seek advice and act within the 21 days!
Laws were passed in June 2012 that dramatically increase the scope of the DPN laws and director personal liability. In brief, the laws:
Yes, the old DPN laws still apply so you may get a DPN that gives no opportunity to have the penalty remitted, being a Lockdown DPN, or one that gives 21 days in which to act and avoid personal liability. In practice, the ATO will often issue both a Lockdown DPN and a 21-Day DPN at the same time.
Yes. The DPN laws are designed to change the behaviour of directors. In the past, directors tended to leave tax debts at the bottom of the payments pile. That was often achieved by directors simply not complying with tax lodgement and payment requirements – BASs were not lodged on time and tax debts were often the last to be paid. That is now a very bad approach. The two simple rules are:
And to be clear, if the company can’t pay the debt due under a BAS for PAYG or a Super debt, lodge the return anyway, otherwise you will be personally liable for the debt.
Under Superannuation Guarantee law, if an employer is not able to meet their superannuation obligations by the due date for payment, they are required to lodge a “Superannuation guarantee charge statement – quarterly (NAT9599)“ with the ATO. With this legislation it is important that a company lodge a NAT9599 with the ATO within 3 months of the due payment date or its’ directors will be automatically personally liable for the company’s Superannuation Guarantee Charge (SGC) liability. It should be noted that SGC is made up of the shortfall in Super payments plus interest (10% pa) and a processing fee (currently $20 per employee, per period). So unlike PAYG where a director is made liable for the shortfall only, for Super the director is liable for the shortfall plus interest and fees.
Not straight away. A new director of a company is liable for PAYG and SGC debts but not until 30 days after they become a director. That period is designed to give the new director time to assess if there is a backlog of PAYG or SGC and gives time for them to act, or resign.
If returns are not lodged, and so the ATO doesn’t know the specific amount that a company owes for SGC liabilities, then the ATO can estimate those amounts and issue the DPN using those estimates.
A director has a defence in relation to a Director Penalty Notice if the director had an illness that prevented him or her participating in the management of the company, or if the director took all reasonable steps to ensure the company complied with its tax obligations.
No. There have been court cases where directors claimed they did not receive the DPN. The Courts accepted the ATO evidence that the ATO had sent the DPNs to the correct address. If a director has moved address, and failed to update their addresses with the ATO, then that is a problem for the director rather than the ATO. Further, the ATO can serve a DPN on a director by sending the DPN to the company’s tax agent’s address.